Greg Harrison, et al v. Sasol North America, et al
| SKIPPER THOMAS, JR., GREG HARRISON and BRIAN THOMAS |
| WESTLAKE CHEMICAL CORPORATION and PHILLIPS 66 |
| 20-30195 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Greg Harrison, et al v. Sasol North America, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Mary Katherine Beaird for Appellant Skipper Thomas Jr. in 20-30195, Attorney Mary Katherine Beaird for Appellant Brian Thomas in 20-30195, Attorney Mary Katherine Beaird for Appellant Greg Harrison in 20-30195 [20-30195] (RLL) [Entered: 04/30/2020 04:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Mary Katherine Beaird, Esq. for Mr. Greg Harrison, Mr. Brian Thomas and Mr. Skipper Thomas, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-30195] (Mary Katherine Beaird ) [Entered: 04/30/2020 10:29 AM] |
| Attorney Ms. Mary Katherine Beaird, Esq. for Appellants Mr. Brian Thomas, Mr. Greg Harrison and Mr. Skipper Thomas, Jr. is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: Counsel failed to complete the lower portion of the form to include the case number and style of related case(s). [20-30195] (LBM) [Entered: 04/29/2020 04:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Mary Katherine Beaird, Esq. for Mr. Greg Harrison, Mr. Brian Thomas and Mr. Skipper Thomas, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-30195] (Mary Katherine Beaird ) [Entered: 04/29/2020 03:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Paul Ieyoub for Appellee Phillips 66 in 20-30195 [20-30195] (MRW) [Entered: 04/21/2020 09:50 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Christopher Paul Ieyoub for Phillips 66 for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-30195] (Christopher Paul Ieyoub ) [Entered: 04/21/2020 08:34 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-30195] (MRW) [Entered: 04/17/2020 09:36 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/27/2020 for Appellants Greg Harrison, Brian Thomas and Skipper Thomas Jr.. [20-30195] (MRW) [Entered: 04/17/2020 09:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mandy A. Simon for party(s) Appellee Westlake Chemical Corporation, in case 20-30195 [20-30195] (RLL) [Entered: 04/09/2020 03:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Catherine Marie Landry for Appellee Westlake Chemical Corporation in 20-30195 [20-30195] (RLL) [Entered: 04/09/2020 03:27 PM] |
| Attorney Mandy Simon is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [20-30195] (BF) [Entered: 04/09/2020 02:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-30195] (Mandy A. Simon ) [Entered: 04/09/2020 02:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-30195] (Catherine Marie Landry ) [Entered: 04/09/2020 02:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-30195] (Catherine Marie Landry ) [Entered: 04/09/2020 02:13 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9284469-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-30195] (RLL) [Entered: 04/01/2020 08:50 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 2:19-CV-1092. Electronic ROA due on 04/16/2020. [20-30195] (RLL) [Entered: 04/01/2020 08:54 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Greg Harrison, Mr. Brian Thomas and Mr. Skipper Thomas, Jr. [20-30195] (RLL) [Entered: 03/19/2020 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.