Richard Seaton, Jr. v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD A. SEATON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Case Number: 20-30254
Filed: April 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 15, 2022 Seaton v. Goodwin

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2020 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Richard A. Seaton, Jr. to extend time to file brief as appellant until 06/22/2020 [9328147-2], to extend time to file record excerpts until 06/22/2020 [9328147-3]. Date of service: 06/05/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Harville; Attorney for Appellee: Williams [20-30254] (Douglas Lee Harville ) [Entered: 06/05/2020 09:01 AM]
June 5, 2020 CLERK ORDER granting unopposed motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Richard A. Seaton, Jr. [ # 9328147-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/22/2020 for Appellant Richard A. Seaton Jr.; granting unopposed motion to extend time to file record excerpts filed by Appellant Mr. Richard A. Seaton, Jr. [ # 9328147-3 ] Record Excerpts deadline updated to 06/22/2020 for Appellant Richard A. Seaton Jr. [20-30254] (CB) [Entered: 06/05/2020 09:05 AM]
April 27, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/08/2020 for Appellant Richard A. Seaton Jr.. [20-30254] (MRW) [Entered: 04/27/2020 03:58 PM]
April 27, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-30254] (MRW) [Entered: 04/27/2020 03:57 PM]
April 23, 2020 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary - no hearings. [20-30254] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Richard A. Seaton, Jr. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 04/23/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Harville; Attorney for Appellee: Williams [20-30254] (Douglas Lee Harville ) [Entered: 04/23/2020 09:31 AM]
April 22, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9299036-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-30254] (SEP) [Entered: 04/22/2020 04:02 PM]
April 22, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:17-CV-1556. Electronic ROA due on 05/07/2020. [20-30254] (SEP) [Entered: 04/22/2020 04:04 PM]
April 15, 2020 PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard A. Seaton, Jr. [20-30254] (RLL) [Entered: 04/15/2020 09:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Seaton, Jr. v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: RICHARD A. SEATON, JR.
Represented By: Douglas Lee Harville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Represented By: Suzanne Morelock Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?