Marion Taylor v. James LeBlanc, et al
| DARREL VANNOY and JAMES M. LEBLANC |
| MARION TAYLOR |
| 20-30264 |
| April 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Marion Taylor in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9337094-2 ]. [9337096-1] [20-30264] (MRW) [Entered: 06/18/2020 04:33 PM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9337094-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Marion Taylor [20-30264] (MRW) [Entered: 06/18/2020 04:33 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellee Mr. James M. LeBlanc to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9337094-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 07/09/2020 for Appellant Marion Taylor. [20-30264] (MRW) [Entered: 06/18/2020 04:29 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/14/2020 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Marion Taylor because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee due on 06/15/2020 for Appellant Marion Taylor. [20-30264] (SEP) [Entered: 05/15/2020 08:40 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Marion Taylor. Fee deadline satisfied. [20-30264] (SEP) [Entered: 05/04/2020 03:55 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9303501-2] Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 06/23/2020 for Appellant Marion Taylor [20-30264] (MAS) [Entered: 04/29/2020 02:25 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marion Taylor [20-30264] (MAS) [Entered: 04/22/2020 01:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
