Ladner v. Walmart
| TAMMI LADNER |
| WALMART, INCORPORATED |
| 20-30352 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Tammi Ladner v. Walmart, Incorporated |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [20-30352] (RLL) [Entered: 11/25/2020 08:49 AM]
|
|
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [20-30352 Affirmed] Judge: CDK, Judge: JES, Judge: CTW. Mandate issue date is 11/25/2020 [20-30352] (CCR) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:49 PM]
|
|
JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. Costs Taxed Against: appellant. [20-30352] (CCR) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:55 PM]
|
|
The Motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief filed by Appellee Walmart, Incorporated in 20-30352 [ # 9421465-2 ] has been made sufficient. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Rpl deadline satisfied. [20-30352] (MCS) [Entered: 10/15/2020 01:39 PM]
|
|
OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee for leave to file to file a sur-reply brief [9421465-2]. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 10/20/2020 for Appellee Walmart, Incorporated [20-30352] Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Certificate of Compliance including the word count is missing from the motion. REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION of Appellee for leave to file to file a sur-reply brief [9421465-2]. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Certificate of Compliance including word count is missing from the motion. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 10/20/2020 for Appellee Walmart, Incorporated [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee Walmart, Incorporated for leave to file document [9421465-2]. Date of service: 10/15/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (Stephen Paul Beiser ) [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:43 AM]
|
|
COURT ORDER that appellee's opposed motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief is DENIED [ # 9421465-2 ]. [20-30352] (MCS) [Entered: 10/15/2020 02:17 PM]
|
|
BRIEFING COMPLETE. [20-30352] (RLL) [Entered: 09/30/2020 12:07 PM]
|
|
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner [ # 9396183-2 ] Date of service: 09/28/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:22 PM]
|
|
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner in 20-30352 [ # 9396183-2 ] Brief has been deemed insufficient. Additional corrections required: The Table of Authorities, Certificate of Service and Certificate of Type Volume Compliance needs to be listed on the Table of Contents. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Sufficient Brief deadline updated to 10/13/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner [ # 9396183-2 ] Date of service: 09/23/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 09/23/2020 08:13 PM]
|
|
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Reply Brief received from Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner because the incorrect event was used [20-30352] (MRW) [Entered: 09/22/2020 03:10 PM]
|
|
APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0. Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied (PAPER COPY REQUESTS ARE SUSPENDED AT THIS TIME AND WILL BE REQUESTED WHEN NEEDED) [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires proper record citations are required. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Reply Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 09/23/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner. [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Ms. Tammi Ladner. Date of service: 09/09/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 09/09/2020 09:38 PM]
|
|
APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 09/09/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Walmart, Incorporated. Date of service: 08/19/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (Stephen Paul Beiser ) [Entered: 08/19/2020 03:50 PM]
|
|
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner [ # 9368609-2 ] Date of service: 08/11/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 08/11/2020 11:42 AM]
|
|
SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require citations to the record in the table of contents. Optional contents exceed page limitations by 2 pages. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0. Record Excerpts deadline satisfied. Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 08/18/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner. [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner. Date of service: 08/01/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 08/01/2020 05:10 PM]
|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephen Paul Beiser for Appellee Walmart, Incorporated in 20-30352 [20-30352] (CB) [Entered: 07/31/2020 01:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Stephen Paul Beiser for Walmart, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-30352] (Stephen Paul Beiser ) [Entered: 07/30/2020 09:13 AM] |
| PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner [ # 9359564-2 ] Date of service: 07/24/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 07/24/2020 05:15 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appellant's brief received from Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner in accordance with the clerk's notice of 7/21/20, any corrections to the brief must be filed as a proposed sufficient brief [20-30352] (MRW) [Entered: 07/24/2020 09:20 AM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Additionally the Brief requires signature on certificate of intereted persons, opposiing counsel name is not on the certificate of service. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 08/03/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner. Sufficient Brief due on 08/04/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner.. Appellee's Brief due on 08/19/2020 for Appellee Walmart, Incorporated [20-30352] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Tammi Ladner. Date of service: 07/20/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Beiser; Attorney for Appellant: Wilson [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 07/20/2020 04:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Courtney Wilson for Appellant Tammi Ladner in 20-30352 [20-30352] (AGL) [Entered: 06/22/2020 03:57 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-30352] (John Courtney Wilson ) [Entered: 06/21/2020 06:08 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-30352] (SEP) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:12 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/20/2020 for Appellant Tammi Ladner. [20-30352] (SEP) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:14 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9328810-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-30352] (RLL) [Entered: 06/05/2020 03:14 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 2:18-CV-10067. Electronic ROA due on 06/22/2020. [20-30352] (RLL) [Entered: 06/05/2020 03:17 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Tammi Ladner. [20-30352] (RLL) [Entered: 06/02/2020 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ladner v. Walmart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: TAMMI LADNER | |
| Represented By: | John Courtney Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WALMART, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Paul Beiser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
