Edwin Codrington v. Darrel Vannoy, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Luke Rheems, Colonel, Nyesha Davis, Gary Aymond, Major, Darrel Vannoy, Warden and John Hebert, Major
Plaintiff / Appellant: Edwin Codrington
Case Number: 20-30460
Filed: July 24, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 3, 2021 Codrington v. Vannoy, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/16/2020 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Edwin Codrington because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 10/19/2020 for Appellant Edwin Codrington [20-30460] (MAS) [Entered: 09/18/2020 12:57 PM]
September 16, 2020 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Edwin Codrington. Fee deadline satisfied. [20-30460] (MRW) [Entered: 09/16/2020 11:10 AM]
September 16, 2020 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Edwin Codrington unnecessary the motion to proceed IFP ispending in district court [20-30460] (MRW) [Entered: 09/16/2020 11:06 AM]
July 29, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9366183-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/22/2020 for Appellant Edwin Codrington [20-30460] (CB) [Entered: 07/29/2020 01:53 PM]
July 24, 2020 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Edwin Codrington [20-30460] (MCS) [Entered: 07/24/2020 10:10 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edwin Codrington v. Darrel Vannoy, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Luke Rheems, Colonel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Nyesha Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Gary Aymond, Major
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Hebert, Major
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Edwin Codrington
Represented By: Edwin Codrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?