Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. Kempt, et al
| WATSON, Law Library Clerk, C. MARTINEZ, Step 2 Coordinator, S. SMITH, Law Library Supervisor, KEMPT, Assistant Warden, M. PRICE, Investigator III and V. MATLOCK, Investigator II |
| CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR. |
| 20-40007 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 6:19-CV-567. Electronic ROA due on 03/18/2020. [20-40007] (DLM) [Entered: 03/03/2020 12:30 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. referencing Motion to extend time to return a sufficient motion for IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. in 20-40007 [ # 9256350-2 ]. [20-40007] (DLM) [Entered: 03/03/2020 12:24 PM] |
| The Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. in 20-40007 [ # 9246114-2 ] has been made sufficient. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Rpl deadline satisfied. [20-40007] (DLM) [Entered: 03/03/2020 12:28 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting motion to extend time to return a sufficient motion filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. by sending an inmate trust fund statement [ # 9256350-2 ] Sufficient Motion,Response,Reply due deadline updated to 02/28/2020 for Appellant Curtis Lee Sheppard Jr. [20-40007] (DLM) [Entered: 02/21/2020 01:12 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. to extend the time to return a sufficient Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA by providing an inmate trust fund account statement [ # 9246114-2 ] [9256350-2]. Date of service: 02/12/2020 [20-40007] (DLM) [Entered: 02/21/2020 01:11 PM] |
| MEMO IN SUPPORT of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER [ # 9246114-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. [20-40007] (MRW) [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:17 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER [9246114-2] Fee deadline canceled. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: need inmate trust fund statement Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 02/18/2020 for Appellant Curtis Lee Sheppard Jr. [20-40007] (MRW) [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:14 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion to Stay Permission to Proceed In forma Pauperis as a Sanctioned Pro se Litigant received from Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. because appears to be unnecessary as the sanction imposed in 17-11435 does not apply in this case, and any attempt to seek relief from the sanction imposed in the 8/31/18 order in case no. 17-11435 has long since expired. [20-40007] (DLM) [Entered: 01/30/2020 01:41 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9228556-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 01/28/2020 for Appellant Curtis Lee Sheppard Jr. [20-40007] (DMS) [Entered: 01/13/2020 12:55 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Court's Advance Written Permission of Expunging Case, Motion for Permission to Prceed as a Sanctioned Pro Se Litigant, and Offender Grievence Form received from Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. no jurisdiction to grant the requested relief [20-40007] (MRW) [Entered: 01/15/2020 02:50 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr. [20-40007] (AS) [Entered: 01/07/2020 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
