Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari v. James Dimon, et al
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and JAMES DIMON |
FEYSAL AYATI-GHAFFARI |
20-40202 |
March 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/23/2020 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari. Fee or motion for IFP in 5CCA due on 05/26/2020 for Appellant Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari [20-40202] (ABT) [Entered: 04/27/2020 08:50 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP & motion for appointment of counsel pending for Appellant Mr. Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari. [20-40202] (JMW) [Entered: 04/09/2020 07:52 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Marcie Lynn Schout for Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. in 20-40202, Attorney Marcie Lynn Schout for Appellee James Dimon in 20-40202, by Attorney(s) William Lance Lewis for party(s) Appellee James Dimon Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., in case 20-40202 [20-40202] (ABT) [Entered: 03/24/2020 03:02 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9278478-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [20-40202] (CCR) [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:34 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Marcie Lynn Schout, Esq. for Mr. James Dimon and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-40202] (Marcie Lynn Schout ) [Entered: 03/24/2020 09:24 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-40202] (William Lance Lewis ) [Entered: 03/24/2020 09:32 AM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari [20-40202] (CCR) [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.