Dolores Machuca v. Megan Brennan
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOLORES MACHUCA
Defendant / Appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer, United States Postal Service
Case Number: 20-50193
Filed: March 12, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 16, 2020 Dolores Machuca v. Megan Brennan

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/26/2020 for Appellant Dolores Machuca. [20-50193] (RLL) [Entered: 04/15/2020 05:01 PM]
April 15, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-50193] (RLL) [Entered: 04/15/2020 05:00 PM]
April 13, 2020 FEE PAID by Appellant Ms. Dolores Machuca. Fee deadline satisfied [20-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 04/13/2020 02:52 PM]
April 13, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:17-CV-46. Electronic ROA due on 04/28/2020. [20-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 04/13/2020 02:52 PM]
March 25, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Manuel Romero for Appellee Megan J. Brennan in 20-50193 [20-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/25/2020 03:14 PM]
March 25, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50193] (Manuel Romero ) [Entered: 03/25/2020 01:29 PM]
March 20, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Alfonso Kennard Jr. for Appellant Dolores Machuca in 20-50193 [20-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/20/2020 02:46 PM]
March 19, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9274761-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/03/2020 for Appellant Dolores Machuca [20-50193] (CCR) [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:12 AM]
March 19, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Alfonso Kennard, Jr., Esq. for Ms. Dolores Machuca for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50193] (Alfonso Kennard Jr.) [Entered: 03/19/2020 11:36 AM]
March 19, 2020 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [20-50193] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Dolores Machuca advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 03/19/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Kennard; Attorney for Appellees: Paniszczyn, Romero [20-50193] (Alfonso Kennard Jr.) [Entered: 03/19/2020 11:37 AM]
March 12, 2020 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Dolores Machuca [20-50193] (CCR) [Entered: 03/12/2020 04:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dolores Machuca v. Megan Brennan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DOLORES MACHUCA
Represented By: Alfonso Kennard Esq. Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer, United States Postal Service
Represented By: Manuel Romero
Represented By: John Francis Paniszczyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?