In re: Elena Sammons, et al
| MICHAEL SAMMONS and In re: ELENA SAMMONS |
| 20-50217 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [20-50217] (CNF) [Entered: 03/19/2020 03:44 PM] |
| PETITION filed by Petitioners Ms. Elena Sammons and Mr. Michael Sammons for writ of mandamus [9275466-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/18/2020.. Date of Service: 03/15/2020 [20-50217] (CNF) [Entered: 03/19/2020 03:58 PM] |
| FEE PAID. (Receipt No. 5275)[20-50217] (CNF) [Entered: 03/19/2020 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Elena Sammons, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MICHAEL SAMMONS | |
| Represented By: | Michael Sammons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: ELENA SAMMONS | |
| Represented By: | Elena Sammons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
