Theron Rhoten, et al v. Brent Stroman, et al
| BONAR CRUMP, JR., RYAN WILLIAM CRAFT, JONATHAN LOPEZ, JIM ALBERT HARRIS, THERON RHOTEN, JUAN CARLOS GARCIA and DREW KING |
| DETECTIVE JEFFREY ROGERS, in his individual capacity, DETECTIVE MANUEL CHAVEZ, in his individual capacity, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ABELINO REYNA, in his individual capacity, ASSISTANT CHIEF ROBERT LANNING, in his individual capacity and CHIEF BRENT STROMAN, in his individual capacity |
| 20-50276 |
| April 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Charles D. Olson for Mr. Manuel Chavez, Mr. Robert Lanning, Mr. Jeffrey Rogers and Mr. Brent Stroman for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50276] (Charles D. Olson ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:50 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-50276] (Charles Alfred Mackenzie ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 12:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-50276] (Michael W. Dixon ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 12:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael W. Dixon for party(s) Appellant Jeffrey Rogers Appellant Robert Lanning Appellant Brent Stroman Appellant Manuel Chavez, in case 20-50276 [20-50276] (CAS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 12:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Charles Alfred Mackenzie for party(s) Appellant Jeffrey Rogers Appellant Robert Lanning Appellant Brent Stroman Appellant Manuel Chavez, in case 20-50276 [20-50276] (CAS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 01:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Charles D. Olson for Appellant Jeffrey Rogers in 20-50276, Attorney Charles D. Olson for Appellant Robert Lanning in 20-50276, Attorney Charles D. Olson for Appellant Manuel Chavez in 20-50276, Attorney Charles D. Olson for Appellant Brent Stroman in 20-50276 [20-50276] (CAS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 01:40 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Thomas Phillip Brandt for Mr. Abelino Reyna for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50276] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 03:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-50276] (Stephen Douglas Henninger ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 03:25 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Abelino Reyna advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 04/08/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Brandt, Dixon, Mackenzie, Olson; Attorney for Appellees: Coon, Kita [20-50276] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 03:30 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Manuel Chavez, Mr. Robert Lanning, Mr. Jeffrey Rogers and Mr. Brent Stroman advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 04/08/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Brandt, Dixon, Mackenzie, Olson; Attorney for Appellees: Coon, Kita [20-50276] (Charles Alfred Mackenzie ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 03:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephen Douglas Henninger for party(s) Appellant Abelino Reyna, in case 20-50276 [20-50276] (CAS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 04:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Thomas Phillip Brandt for Appellant Abelino Reyna in 20-50276 [20-50276] (CAS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 04:41 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Manuel Chavez, Mr. Robert Lanning, Mr. Jeffrey Rogers and Mr. Brent Stroman [20-50276] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/07/2020 02:17 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9288893-2] Parties added: Appellant Abelino Reyna. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Abelino Reyna. [9288893-1] [20-50276] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/07/2020 02:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
