USA v. Casey Murray
Casey Allen Murray |
United States of America |
20-50594 |
July 21, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9360848-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (Motion to Withdraw as Counsel pending in District Court) [20-50594] (AGL) [Entered: 07/22/2020 10:47 AM] |
JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT ORDER entered in the District Court. [20-50594] (AGL) [Entered: 07/22/2020 10:37 AM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Casey Allen Murray [20-50594] (RSM) [Entered: 07/21/2020 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Casey Murray | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Casey Allen Murray | |
Represented By: | Luke Nathanial Garrett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.