Sharon McCary-Banister v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sharon Renee McCary-Banister
Defendant / Appellant: Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 20-50673
Filed: August 18, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2020 COURT ORDER granting Motion to stay further proceedings in this court pending a decision in the consolidated appeals of Hernandez v. Saul, No. 20-50418, and Palmer v. Saul, No. 20-50420, filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew M. Saul [ # 9401085-2 ] [20-50673] (MVM) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:45 PM]
September 16, 2020 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew M. Saul to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: Stay briefing pending a decision in this Court's cases Hernandez v. Saul and Palmer v. Saul. Date of service: 09/16/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barnhill, Mundell; Attorney for Appellee: Chermol [20-50673] (Amanda Mundell ) [Entered: 09/16/2020 12:11 PM]
September 15, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-50673] (DDL) [Entered: 09/15/2020 04:24 PM]
September 15, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/26/2020 for Appellant Andrew M. Saul. [20-50673] (DDL) [Entered: 09/15/2020 04:26 PM]
September 2, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David F. Chermol for Appellee Sharon Renee McCary-Banister in 20-50673 [20-50673] (MAS) [Entered: 09/02/2020 04:41 PM]
September 2, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Amanda Mundell for party(s) Appellant Andrew M. Saul, in case 20-50673 [20-50673] (MAS) [Entered: 09/02/2020 04:39 PM]
August 31, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. David F. Chermol for Ms. Sharon Renee McCary-Banister for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50673] (David F. Chermol ) [Entered: 08/31/2020 04:05 PM]
August 31, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50673] (Amanda Mundell ) [Entered: 08/31/2020 03:34 PM]
August 26, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9385769-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-50673] (MVM) [Entered: 08/26/2020 07:32 AM]
August 26, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:19-CV-782. Electronic ROA due on 09/10/2020. [20-50673] (MVM) [Entered: 08/26/2020 07:57 AM]
August 18, 2020 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew M. Saul [20-50673] (RSM) [Entered: 08/18/2020 11:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sharon McCary-Banister v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Sharon Renee McCary-Banister
Represented By: David F. Chermol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jamie L. Barnhill
Represented By: Amanda Mundell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?