David Thacker, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner / Appellant: David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Case Number: 20-50816
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gretchen Berumen Merenda for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 20-50816 [20-50816] (LLL) [Entered: 11/20/2020 04:16 PM]
November 20, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50816] (Gretchen Berumen Merenda ) [Entered: 11/20/2020 09:02 AM]
November 12, 2020 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. David Kent Thacker, Jr. for certificate of appealability [9441244-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [20-50816] (CNF) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:21 PM]
November 12, 2020 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. David Kent Thacker, Jr. in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9441244-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9441247-1] [20-50816] (CNF) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:21 PM]
October 21, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-50816] (CMB) [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:03 PM]
October 15, 2020 LETTER ISSUED due to Other. Motion due deadline updated to 11/16/2020 for Appellant David Kent Thacker Jr.. Brief in Support deadline updated to 11/16/2020 for Appellant David Kent Thacker Jr. [20-50816] (CNF) [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:39 AM]
October 15, 2020 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to return the undefined documents - Magna Carta as requested. [20-50816] (CNF) [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:25 AM]
September 30, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9411131-2] Motion due on 11/09/2020 for Appellant David Kent Thacker Jr.. Brief in Support due on 11/09/2020 for Appellant David Kent Thacker Jr. [20-50816] (CNF) [Entered: 09/30/2020 01:47 PM]
September 30, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-201. Electronic ROA due on 10/15/2020. [20-50816] (CNF) [Entered: 09/30/2020 01:54 PM]
September 25, 2020 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. David Kent Thacker, Jr. [20-50816] (LEF) [Entered: 09/25/2020 08:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Thacker, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Represented By: Gretchen Berumen Merenda Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Represented By: David Kent Thacker Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?