Cathy Carr v. National Presto Industries, et al
Cathy Carr |
Other Unknown Defendants, National Presto Industries, Incorporated, The Wal-Mart Store and The Walmart Corporation |
20-50851 |
October 5, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Timothy Riley Schupp for Appellee National Presto Industries, Incorporated in for party(s) Appellee Walmart Corporation Appellee Wal-Mart Store, in case 20-50851 [20-50851] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/23/2020 11:54 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Robert William Vaccaro for party(s) Appellee National Presto Industries, Incorporated Appellee Walmart Corporation Appellee Wal-Mart Store, in case 20-50851 [20-50851] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/23/2020 12:37 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-50851] (Robert William Vaccaro ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 12:15 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Timothy Riley Schupp, Esq. for National Presto Industries, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-50851] (Timothy Riley Schupp ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 12:11 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for dc#82 motion for reconsideration. [9419421-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [20-50851] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/13/2020 11:02 AM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9417481-2] NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Cathy Carr. [9417481-1] [20-50851] (LEF) [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:49 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Cathy Carr [20-50851] (CBW) [Entered: 10/05/2020 08:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.