Tiede v. Martinez
| Javier Salazar, Bexar County Sheriff, Hung Dinh, Bexar County Deputy, and in his Individual Capacity, Miguel Delgado, Sgt. Bexar County Sheriff, Arnold Martinez, Lt. Bexar County Sheriff, and in His Individual Capacity and Regina Ramirez, Cpl. Bexar County Sheriff's Deputy |
| Kurt Steven Tiede |
| 20-50905 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the motion to vacate the appeal received from Appellant Mr. Kurt Steven Tiede because mit is unnecessary. The appeal was dismissed on November 17, 2020 on appellant's own motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal [20-50905] (CNF) [Entered: 12/22/2020 07:37 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Kurt Steven Tiede [ # 9444689-2 ] [20-50905] (CNF) [Entered: 11/17/2020 03:17 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kurt Steven Tiede to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9444689-2]. [20-50905] (CNF) [Entered: 11/17/2020 03:13 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9435422-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 12/29/2020 for Appellant Kurt Steven Tiede [20-50905] (CAS) [Entered: 11/04/2020 10:51 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kurt Steven Tiede [20-50905] (MFY) [Entered: 10/27/2020 09:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
