Flores-Ayala v. Barr
Petitioner: LUIS ERNESTO FLORES-AYALA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Case Number: 20-60280
Filed: April 6, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2020 IMMIGRATION RECORD FILED. [20-60280] (DOJ Executive Office of Immigration Review ) [Entered: 05/20/2020 08:59 PM]
May 6, 2020 COURT ORDER granting Motion to dismiss petition for review for lack of jurisdiction filed by Respondent Mr. William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General [ # 9289537-2 ]; denying as moot Motion for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Mr. Luis Ernesto Flores-Ayala [ # 9288091-2 ]. [20-60280] (CCR) [Entered: 05/06/2020 01:28 PM]
April 8, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9289830-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60280] (MCS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 02:32 PM]
April 8, 2020 MOTION filed by Respondent William P. Barr to dismiss petition for review for lack of jurisdiction [9289537-2]. Response/Opposition due on 04/20/2020. [20-60280] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Respondent Mr. William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General to dismiss petition for review for lack of jurisdiction [9289537-2]. Date of service: 04/08/2020 via US mail - Attorney for Petitioner: Garzon; email - Attorney for Respondents: Lum, OIL [20-60280] (Virginia M. Lum ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:25 AM]
April 8, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Virginia M. Lum for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General, in case 20-60280 [20-60280] (MRW) [Entered: 04/08/2020 10:18 AM]
April 8, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60280] (Virginia M. Lum ) [Entered: 04/08/2020 09:35 AM]
April 6, 2020 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Luis Ernesto Flores-Ayala for stay of removal [9288091-2]. Date of service: 11/19/2019. Response/Opposition due on 04/16/2020. [20-60280] (MCS) [Entered: 04/06/2020 03:37 PM]
April 6, 2020 AGENCY TRANSFER CASE docketed. Filing order of the Second Circuit transferring case to this Court. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/03/2020. Immigration File Number: a202 085 147 Administrative Record due on 05/18/2020. [20-60280] (MCS) [Entered: 04/06/2020 03:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Flores-Ayala v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LUIS ERNESTO FLORES-AYALA
Represented By: John J. Garzon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Office of Immigration Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Represented By: Virginia M. Lum
Represented By: Office of Immigration Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?