Patrick HollowellIn re: Patrick Hollowell
| In re: PATRICK HOLLOWELL |
| 20-60354 |
| April 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Patrick Hollowell for authorization to file successive petition 2255 [9304566-1] Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/30/2020.. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: need proposed petition Motion due deadline satisfied.. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 06/01/2020 for Movant Patrick Hollowell. [20-60354] (MRW) [Entered: 04/30/2020 02:50 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/29/2020 transferring successive 2255 petition to this court. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/30/2020. Motion due on 06/01/2020 for Movant Patrick Hollowell [20-60354] (MAS) [Entered: 04/30/2020 02:26 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [20-60354] (MAS) [Entered: 04/30/2020 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Patrick HollowellIn re: Patrick Hollowell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: PATRICK HOLLOWELL | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Hollowell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
