Gipson Fernandes v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
GIPSON FERNANDES |
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
20-60386 |
May 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60386] (Margot P. Kniffin ) [Entered: 05/14/2020 05:32 AM] |
IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Gipson Fernandes. Date received in 5th Circuit: 05/13/2020. Immigration File Number: A216 075 024. Administrative Record due on 06/22/2020. [20-60386] (SEP) [Entered: 05/13/2020 03:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gipson Fernandes v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: GIPSON FERNANDES | |
Represented By: | Imran B. Mirza Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.