Olasupo Fatubaro v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
OLASUPO FATUBARO, also known as Olasupo Temidayo Fatubaro, also known as Simon Arkless |
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
20-60409 |
May 21, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60409] (Jacob Alexander Bashyrov ) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:14 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jacob Alexander Bashyrov for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General, in case 20-60409. [20-60409] (SEP) [Entered: 05/22/2020 04:14 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9318529-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60409] (CB) [Entered: 05/22/2020 08:33 AM] |
MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Olasupo Fatubaro for stay of removal [9318326-2] Notice of Intent Due on 05/26/2020 for Respondent William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General. Response/Opposition due on 06/01/2020. [20-60409] (CB) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:46 PM] |
EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for Review [ # 9318302-2 ] filed by Petitioner Mr. Olasupo Fatubaro [20-60409] (CB) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:51 PM] |
MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Olasupo Fatubaro to proceed in forma pauperis [9318320-2]. Requested financial affidavit. [20-60409] (CB) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:43 PM] |
IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Olasupo Fatubaro. Date received in 5th Circuit: 05/21/2020. Immigration File Number: a078 990 809 Affidavit due on 06/11/2020 for Petitioner Olasupo Fatubaro. Administrative Record due on 06/30/2020 [20-60409] (CB) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.