Jonathan Mendoza-Erazo v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
JONATHAN JOEL MENDOZA-ERAZO |
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
20-60490 |
June 17, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9336207-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60490] (CB) [Entered: 06/17/2020 04:23 PM] |
IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Jonathan Joel Mendoza-Erazo. Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/16/2020. Immigration File Number: a206 423 019 Administrative Record due on 07/27/2020 [20-60490] (MCS) [Entered: 06/17/2020 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jonathan Mendoza-Erazo v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JONATHAN JOEL MENDOZA-ERAZO | |
Represented By: | Jaesa Woods McLin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.