Lion Elastomers v. NLRB
LION ELASTOMERS |
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
20-60499 |
June 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9338099-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60499] (MAS) [Entered: 06/19/2020 03:46 PM] |
AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Lion Elastomers. Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/17/2020. Administrative Record due on 07/28/2020 [20-60499] (MAS) [Entered: 06/18/2020 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lion Elastomers v. NLRB | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
Represented By: | Bryan Dooley |
Represented By: | Timothy L. Watson |
Represented By: | David Adrian Foley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: LION ELASTOMERS | |
Represented By: | Jaklyn Leigh Wrigley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.