Sahil Lnu v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
| SAHIL LNU |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-60568 |
| July 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Sahil Lnu. Date received in 5th Circuit: 07/02/2020. Immigration File Number: a201 755 206 Administrative Record due on 08/11/2020. Fee due on 07/17/2020 for Petitioner Sahil Lnu [20-60568] (CB) [Entered: 07/02/2020 02:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sahil Lnu v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SAHIL LNU | |
| Represented By: | Sahil Lnu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
