Zulma Andrade Hernandez, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
| Zulma Jeannette Andrade Hernandez, Alisson Andra Ramos Andrade and Yoselin Yaneth Ramos Andrade |
| William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General |
| 20-60731 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Clark Minick for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General, in case 20-60731 [20-60731] (AGL) [Entered: 08/13/2020 04:51 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9376904-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60731] (CB) [Entered: 08/13/2020 11:42 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Alisson Andra Ramos Andrade in 20-60731, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Yoselin Yaneth Ramos Andrade in 20-60731, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Zulma Jeannette Andrade Hernandez in 20-60731 [20-60731] (AGL) [Entered: 08/13/2020 10:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60731] (William Clark Minick ) [Entered: 08/12/2020 05:01 PM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Ms. Zulma Jeannette Andrade Hernandez, Ms. Alisson Andra Ramos Andrade and Mr. Yoselin Yaneth Ramos Andrade. Date received in 5th Circuit: 08/12/2020. Immigration File Number: a209 171 901,a209 171 902,a209 171 903 Administrative Record due on 09/21/2020 [20-60731] (CB) [Entered: 08/12/2020 11:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
