USA v. Christopher Cook
Christopher Casey Cook, also known as Casey Cook |
United States of America |
20-60738 |
August 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9378431-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 08/31/2020 for Appellant United States of America. [20-60738] (SEP) [Entered: 08/14/2020 04:25 PM] |
NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant USA. [20-60738] (SEP) [Entered: 08/13/2020 08:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Christopher Cook | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Christopher Casey Cook, also known as Casey Cook | |
Represented By: | Merrill K. Nordstrom |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Paul David Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.