USA v. Curtis Hardy
Defendant / Appellant: Curtis J. Hardy, also known as Curtis Jerome Hardy
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 20-60859
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2022 USA v. Hardy

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-60859] (MRW) [Entered: 09/25/2020 10:02 AM]
September 22, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Princess Williams for Appellant Curtis J. Hardy in 20-60859. [20-60859] (RLL) [Entered: 09/22/2020 04:43 PM]
September 22, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Gregory Layne Kennedy for Appellee USA in 20-60859. [20-60859] (RLL) [Entered: 09/22/2020 04:44 PM]
September 22, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Meghan McCalla for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 20-60859. [20-60859] (RLL) [Entered: 09/22/2020 04:46 PM]
September 21, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-60859] (Meghan McCalla ) [Entered: 09/21/2020 02:55 PM]
September 21, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60859] (Gregory Layne Kennedy ) [Entered: 09/21/2020 02:50 PM]
September 21, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9403784-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-60859] (AGL) [Entered: 09/21/2020 08:49 AM]
September 21, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:03-CR-68-1. Electronic ROA due on 10/06/2020. [20-60859] (AGL) [Entered: 09/21/2020 08:55 AM]
September 21, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Princess Williams for Mr. Curtis J. Hardy for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-60859] (Princess Williams ) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:35 PM]
September 21, 2020 UNOPPOSED MOTION to withdraw as counsel [9404271-2]. Date of Service: 09/21/2020. [20-60859] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Attorney Ms. Princess Williams for Appellant Mr. Curtis J. Hardy to withdraw as counsel [9404271-2]. Date of Service: 09/21/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Kennedy; Attorney for Appellant: Williams [20-60859] (Princess Williams ) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:36 PM]
September 18, 2020 NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis J. Hardy [20-60859] (AGL) [Entered: 09/18/2020 07:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Curtis Hardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Curtis J. Hardy, also known as Curtis Jerome Hardy
Represented By: Princess Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Meghan McCalla
Represented By: Gregory Layne Kennedy Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?