Malkeet Singh v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
| Malkeet Singh |
| William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General |
| 20-60987 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Malkeet Singh. Date received in 5th Circuit: 10/26/2020. Immigration File Number: a201 740 822 Fee due on 11/10/2020 for Petitioner Malkeet Singh. Administrative Record due on 12/07/2020 [20-60987] (CB) [Entered: 10/26/2020 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Malkeet Singh v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Malkeet Singh | |
| Represented By: | Malkeet Singh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
