Sanchez-Paz v. Rosen
| Yury Salome Sanchez-Paz, Maykel Spencer Corrales-Sanchez, Denis Reniery Corrales-Chavez, Nahomy Salome Corrales-Sanchez and Yuris Daniela Corrales-Sanchez |
| Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General |
| 20-61242 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gregory A. Pennington Jr. for party(s) Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General, in case 20-61242 [20-61242] (MCS) [Entered: 01/08/2021 12:24 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-61242] (Gregory A. Pennington Jr.) [Entered: 01/07/2021 07:38 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9473702-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-61242] (CB) [Entered: 01/04/2021 11:37 AM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Mr. Denis Reniery Corrales-Chavez, Mr. Maykel Spencer Corrales-Sanchez, Ms. Nahomy Salome Corrales-Sanchez, Ms. Yuris Daniela Corrales-Sanchez and Ms. Yury Salome Sanchez-Paz. Date received in 5th Circuit: 12/30/2020. Immigration File Number: a213 290 625,a213 290 621,a213 290 626,a213 290 627,a213 290 62. Fee due on 01/15/2021 for Petitioners Denis Reniery Corrales-Chavez, Maykel Spencer Corrales-Sanchez, Nahomy Salome Corrales-Sanchez, Yuris Daniela Corrales-Sanchez and Yury Salome Sanchez-Paz. Administrative Record due on 02/09/2021 [20-61242] (MCS) [Entered: 12/31/2020 12:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
