Chaney v. Lumpkin
| Otis Odell Chaney |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 21-10091 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| The Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Otis Odell Chaney in 21-10091 [ # 9523970-2 ] has been made sufficient. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Rpl deadline satisfied. [21-10091] (CNF) [Entered: 03/31/2021 08:03 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Otis Odell Chaney for certificate of appealability [9523970-2]. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: not signed, document appears to be incomplete Motion due deadline satisfied.. Sufficient Motin due on 04/22/2021 for Appellant Otis Odell Chaney [21-10091] (CNF) [Entered: 03/12/2021 07:57 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Otis Odell Chaney in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9523970-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9539318-1] [21-10091] (CNF) [Entered: 03/31/2021 08:22 AM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise appellant we have requested the district court forward the record c/o warden [21-10091] (CNF) [Entered: 03/08/2021 11:02 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Otis Odell Chaney [ # 9513697-2 ] Motion due deadline updated to 04/22/2021 for Appellant Otis Odell Chaney. Brief in Support deadline updated to 04/22/2021 for Appellant Otis Odell Chaney [21-10091] (CNF) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:45 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Otis Odell Chaney to extend time to comply with COA requirements [9513697-2]. [21-10091] (CNF) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:34 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10091] (DDL) [Entered: 02/12/2021 02:03 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9503004-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 03/23/2021 for Appellant Otis Odell Chaney. Brief in Support due on 03/23/2021 for Appellant Otis Odell Chaney [21-10091] (RAJ) [Entered: 02/11/2021 03:44 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:18-CV-2048. Electronic ROA due on 02/26/2021. [21-10091] (RAJ) [Entered: 02/11/2021 03:48 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Otis Odell Chaney [21-10091] (MFY) [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Chaney v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Otis Odell Chaney | |
| Represented By: | Otis Odell Chaney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Wissinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
