Ortiz v. Perry
Defendant / Appellee: Charles Perry, individually, Dave Roberson, individually, Matthew Powell, individually and Josh Burson, individually
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cynthia Ortiz
Case Number: 21-10112
Filed: February 10, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10112] (CMB) [Entered: 03/25/2021 12:00 PM]
March 25, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/04/2021 for Appellant Cynthia Ortiz. [21-10112] (CMB) [Entered: 03/25/2021 12:05 PM]
March 9, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Cynthia Ortiz advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/09/2021 08:40 AM]
March 9, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:18-CV-137. Electronic ROA due on 03/24/2021. [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/09/2021 08:45 AM]
March 9, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the financial affidavit and appearance form received from Appellant Ms. Cynthia Ortiz because they are unnecessary. [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/09/2021 08:57 AM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William S. Helfand for party(s) Appellee Matthew Powell, in case 21-10112 [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/03/2021 04:22 PM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Patrick Lane for party(s) Appellee Charles Perry, in case 21-10112 [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/03/2021 04:24 PM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jim Charles McGough Jr. for party(s) Appellee Dave Roberson, in case 21-10112 [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/03/2021 04:28 PM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Norman Ray Giles for Appellee Matthew Powell in 21-10112 [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/03/2021 11:40 AM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mary Kathleen Davidson for party(s) Appellee Charles Perry, in case 21-10112 [21-10112] (MFY) [Entered: 03/03/2021 08:50 AM]
March 2, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10112] (William Patrick Lane ) [Entered: 03/02/2021 04:01 PM]
March 2, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10112] (William S. Helfand ) [Entered: 03/02/2021 04:22 PM]
March 2, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10112] (Jim Charles McGough Jr.) [Entered: 03/02/2021 10:56 AM]
March 2, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Norman Ray Giles for Mr. Matthew Powell for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-10112] (Norman Ray Giles ) [Entered: 03/02/2021 04:30 PM]
March 1, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Seth Byron Dennis for Appellee Josh Burson in 21-10112 [21-10112] (RSM) [Entered: 03/01/2021 12:20 PM]
March 1, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-10112] (Mary Kathleen Davidson ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:01 PM]
February 26, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Seth Byron Dennis for Mr. Josh Burson for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10112] (Seth Byron Dennis ) [Entered: 02/26/2021 12:37 PM]
February 24, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9510404-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 03/11/2021 for Appellant Cynthia Ortiz [21-10112] (MRW) [Entered: 02/24/2021 10:11 AM]
February 10, 2021 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Cynthia Ortiz [21-10112] (LEF) [Entered: 02/10/2021 08:47 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Charles Perry, individually
Represented By: Marion Sanford III
Represented By: Mary Kathleen Davidson
Represented By: William Patrick Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Dave Roberson, individually
Represented By: David Charles Youll
Represented By: Jim Charles McGough Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Matthew Powell, individually
Represented By: Norman Ray Giles
Represented By: William S. Helfand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Josh Burson, individually
Represented By: Seth Byron Dennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Cynthia Ortiz
Represented By: Cynthia Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?