Westfall v. Luna
| Jose Luna, Southlake Police Department Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Venessa Trevino, Southlake Police Department Officer, In Her Individual Capacity, Nathaniel Anderson, Southlake Police Department Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Thomas Roberson, Southlake Police Department Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Chris Melton, Southlake Police Department Officer, In His Individual Capacity and City of Southlake |
| Constance Westfall |
| 21-10159 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Westfall v. Luna |
| Westfall v. Luna |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Constance Westfall [ # 9546310-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/04/2021 for Appellant Constance Westfall [21-10159] (LEF) [Entered: 04/08/2021 04:11 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Constance Westfall to extend time to file brief as appellant until 06/04/2021 [9546310-2]. Date of service: 04/08/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Krueger; Attorney for Appellants: Steed, Westfall [21-10159] (Jason Paul Steed ) [Entered: 04/08/2021 03:46 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellees Chris Melton, Thomas Roberson and City of Southlake in 21-10159. Reason: Per appellant, only Luna, Anderson and Trevino are appellees. [21-10159] (CAS) [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Wayne Krueger III for Appellee Venessa Trevino in 21-10159, Attorney William Wayne Krueger III for Appellee Nathaniel Anderson in 21-10159, Attorney William Wayne Krueger III for Appellee Jose Luna in 21-10159 [21-10159] (CAS) [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10159] (William Wayne Krueger III) [Entered: 03/29/2021 10:36 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/05/2021 for Appellant Constance Westfall. [21-10159] (MRW) [Entered: 03/26/2021 04:27 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10159] (MRW) [Entered: 03/26/2021 04:26 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:15-CV-874. Electronic ROA due on 03/30/2021. [21-10159] (LEF) [Entered: 03/15/2021 11:44 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-10159] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Constance Westfall advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 03/15/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Krueger; Attorney for Appellants: Steed, Westfall [21-10159] (Jason Paul Steed ) [Entered: 03/15/2021 09:19 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9516462-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 03/18/2021 for Appellant Constance Westfall [21-10159] (LEF) [Entered: 03/03/2021 03:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jason Paul Steed for party(s) Appellant Constance Westfall, in case 21-10159 [21-10159] (LEF) [Entered: 03/02/2021 04:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10159] (Jason Paul Steed ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:10 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Constance Westfall [21-10159] (MVM) [Entered: 02/25/2021 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
