Belmonte v. City of Dallas, Texas
City of Dallas, Texas |
Abel Belmonte |
21-10163 |
February 25, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COURT ORDER granting jurisdictional review to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9547362-2]. Mandate issue date is 05/04/2021. [21-10163] (MVM) [Entered: 04/12/2021 09:23 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-10163] (MVM) [Entered: 04/09/2021 02:55 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Abel Belmonte [21-10163] (MFY) [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Belmonte v. City of Dallas, Texas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: City of Dallas, Texas | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Carter Huggard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Abel Belmonte | |
Represented By: | Abel Belmonte |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.