Gezu v. Charter Communications
Fisseha Gezu |
Charter Communications |
21-10198 |
March 4, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Fisseha Gezu. Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the citations to the record. Additionally the Brief requires the name of the court must be corrected on the cover page, certificate of interested persons is incorrecly titled, statement of oral argument, statement of jurisdiction and standard of review are required, statement of facts must be included in the statement of the case, brief must be on 82 by 11 iinch p per not legal paper, font must be 14 points or higher, brief contents must be double spaced, appendix must be removed and filed as record excerpts. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 1 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 05/05/2021 for Appellant Fisseha Gezu. Sufficient Brief due on 05/05/2021 for Appellant Fisseha Gezu.. Appellee's Brief due on 05/21/2021 for Appellee Charter Communications [21-10198] (LEF) [Entered: 04/21/2021 03:35 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-10198] (Amy E. Oslica ) [Entered: 03/24/2021 11:06 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Amy E. Oslica for party(s) Appellee Charter Communications, in case 21-10198 [21-10198] (LEF) [Entered: 03/24/2021 03:30 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jasmine Wynton for Appellee Charter Communications in 21-10198 [21-10198] (RSM) [Entered: 03/19/2021 08:22 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jasmine Wynton for Charter Communications for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10198] (Jasmine Wynton ) [Entered: 03/17/2021 03:00 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/21/2021 for Appellant Fisseha Gezu. [21-10198] (MRW) [Entered: 03/12/2021 10:14 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10198] (MRW) [Entered: 03/12/2021 10:13 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9522987-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-10198] (CNF) [Entered: 03/11/2021 11:28 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-1476. Electronic ROA due on 03/26/2021. [21-10198] (CNF) [Entered: 03/11/2021 11:35 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Fisseha Gezu [21-10198] (LEF) [Entered: 03/04/2021 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gezu v. Charter Communications | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Fisseha Gezu | |
Represented By: | Fisseha Gezu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Charter Communications | |
Represented By: | Jasmine Wynton |
Represented By: | Amy E. Oslica |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.