Leal v. Becerra
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Texas Department of Insurance, Janet Yellen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury, United States of America, Kent Sullivan and Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor |
Victor Leal, Kim Armstrong and Patrick Von Dohlen |
21-10302 |
March 26, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Francis Cole for party(s) Appellee Texas Department of Insurance Appellee Kent Sullivan, in case 21-10302. [21-10302] (MFY) [Entered: 05/19/2021 12:00 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10302] (William Francis Cole ) [Entered: 05/18/2021 10:07 AM] |
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Ms. Kim Armstrong, Mr. Patrick Von Dohlen and Mr. Victor Leal. Extension Granted to and including 06/18/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/18/2021 for Appellants Kim Armstrong, Patrick Von Dohlen and Victor Leal [21-10302] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/13/2021 08:48 AM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Ms. Kim Armstrong, Mr. Patrick Von Dohlen and Mr. Victor Leal for filing opening appellants' brief until 06/18/2021 [21-10302] (Jonathan F. Mitchell ) [Entered: 05/12/2021 06:04 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew Tyler Bohuslav for Appellee Texas Department of Insurance in 21-10302, Attorney Matthew Tyler Bohuslav for Appellee Kent Sullivan in 21-10302 [21-10302] (MFY) [Entered: 04/20/2021 11:08 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew Tyler Bohuslav for Mr. Kent Sullivan and Texas Department of Insurance for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10302] (Matthew Tyler Bohuslav ) [Entered: 04/19/2021 01:40 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Karen Schoen for party(s) Appellee USA, Appellee Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Appellee Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Appellee Janet Yellen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury, in case 21-10302. [21-10302] (SEP) [Entered: 04/19/2021 01:23 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10302] (Karen Schoen ) [Entered: 04/16/2021 02:09 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/19/2021 for Appellants Kim Armstrong, Patrick Von Dohlen and Victor Leal. [21-10302] (MRW) [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:22 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10302] (MRW) [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:21 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell for Appellant Kim Armstrong in 21-10302, Attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell for Appellant Patrick Von Dohlen in 21-10302, Attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell for Appellant Victor Leal in 21-10302 [21-10302] (MFY) [Entered: 04/06/2021 11:53 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9542615-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-10302] (MFY) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:05 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-185. Electronic ROA due on 04/20/2021. [21-10302] (MFY) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:11 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jonathan F. Mitchell for Ms. Kim Armstrong, Mr. Patrick Von Dohlen and Mr. Victor Leal for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10302] (Jonathan F. Mitchell ) [Entered: 04/05/2021 08:50 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Kim Armstrong, Mr. Patrick Von Dohlen and Mr. Victor Leal [21-10302] (CBW) [Entered: 03/26/2021 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.