USA v. Alvarez
Defendant / Appellant: Antonio Alvarez, Jr., also known as Tony
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 21-10367
Filed: April 13, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the request to amend appeal by adding claims received from Appellant Mr. Antonio Alvarez, Jr. because it is unclear the relief being sought or if this is to be considered argument which would be included within appellant's brief [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 06/01/2021 01:59 PM]
May 28, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10367] (DDL) [Entered: 05/28/2021 08:20 AM]
May 27, 2021 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise appellant the docketing fee has been paid. [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 05/27/2021 03:55 PM]
May 25, 2021 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 07/06/2021 for Appellant Antonio Alvarez Jr.. Brief in Support due on 07/06/2021 for Appellant Antonio Alvarez Jr. [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 05/25/2021 11:20 AM]
May 25, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-27, 5:18-CR-50-3. Electronic ROA due on 06/09/2021. [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 05/25/2021 11:20 AM]
May 25, 2021 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Antonio Alvarez, Jr.. Fee deadline satisfied (A $505.00 credit card payment has just been authorized for payment of the fee in the above referenced case). [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 05/25/2021 11:18 AM]
May 18, 2021 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise appellant the docketing fee is $505.00 [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 05/18/2021 02:34 PM]
May 13, 2021 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 05/28/2021 for Appellant Antonio Alvarez Jr. [21-10367] (MBC) [Entered: 05/13/2021 09:36 AM]
April 22, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9556578-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 05/07/2021 for Appellant Antonio Alvarez Jr. [21-10367] (MRW) [Entered: 04/22/2021 09:00 AM]
April 20, 2021 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise appellant we do not provide forms and that hs appeal is under review [21-10367] (CNF) [Entered: 04/20/2021 04:06 PM]
April 13, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Alvarez, Jr. [21-10367] (RSM) [Entered: 04/13/2021 02:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Antonio Alvarez, Jr., also known as Tony
Represented By: Antonio Alvarez Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Leigha Amy Simonton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?