Wray v. Home Depot USA
| Norma Wray |
| Home Depot USA, Incorporated |
| 21-10374 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Norma Wray in 21-10374 [ # 9593719-2 ] Brief has been deemed insufficient. Additional corrections required: attachments are not allowed without leave of court. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Sufficient Brief deadline updated to 06/25/2021 for Appellant Norma Wray [21-10374] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Norma Wray [ # 9593719-2 ] Date of service: 06/11/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Boyd; Attorney for Appellee: Higgins [21-10374] (Dan Stewart Boyd ) [Entered: 06/11/2021 11:13 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appendix filed using the letter filed event. received from Appellant Ms. Norma Wray because record excerpts must be filed using the record excerpts filed event and must comply with the guidelines set out in the court's June 10, 2021, letter. [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 06/11/2021 05:01 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Record Excerpts due on 06/24/2021 for Appellant Norma Wray [21-10374] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Additionally the Brief requires Standard of Review is required. Attachments to the brief are not allowed without leave of court.. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 06/24/2021 for Appellant Norma Wray.. Appellee's Brief due on 07/12/2021 for Appellee Home Depot USA, Incorporated [21-10374] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Norma Wray. Date of service: 06/10/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Boyd; Attorney for Appellee: Higgins [21-10374] (Dan Stewart Boyd ) [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:37 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the exhibit to brief received from Appellant Ms. Norma Wray because attachments to briefs are not allowed without leave of court. [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:00 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appendix received from Appellant Ms. Norma Wray because Incorrect filing event was used. [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Dan Stewart Boyd for Appellant Norma Wray in 21-10374 [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 05/07/2021 11:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kristin Snyder Higgins for Appellee Home Depot USA, Incorporated in 21-10374 [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 05/07/2021 11:53 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/16/2021 for Appellant Norma Wray. [21-10374] (MRW) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:05 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10374] (MRW) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:04 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Ms. Norma Wrayfor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/06/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Boyd; Attorney for Appellee: Higgins. [21-10374] (Dan Stewart Boyd ) [Entered: 05/06/2021 09:27 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Dan Stewart Boyd, Esq. for Ms. Norma Wray for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10374] (Dan Stewart Boyd ) [Entered: 05/06/2021 09:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Kristin Snyder Higgins for Home Depot USA, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10374] (Kristin Snyder Higgins ) [Entered: 05/06/2021 09:49 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-2785. Electronic ROA due on 05/21/2021. [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 05/06/2021 04:02 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Norma Wray advising transcript unnecessary Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-10374] (CBW) [Entered: 05/06/2021 04:01 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9557154-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/07/2021 for Appellant Norma Wray. [21-10374] (SEP) [Entered: 04/22/2021 02:20 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Norma Wray [21-10374] (LEF) [Entered: 04/14/2021 04:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wray v. Home Depot USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Norma Wray | |
| Represented By: | Dan Stewart Boyd Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Home Depot USA, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Kristin Snyder Higgins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
