Meth Hosp v. Affiliated FM Ins Co
| Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, doing business as Methodist Health System |
| Affiliated FM Insurance Company |
| 21-10424 |
| April 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Meth Hosp v. Affiliated FM Ins Co |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas. Extension Granted to and including 07/16/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 07/16/2021 for Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/19/2021 09:05 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas for filing Appellant's Brief until 07/16/2021 [21-10424] (Ernest Martin Jr.) [Entered: 05/18/2021 05:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Shannon Marie O'Malley for Appellee Affiliated FM Insurance Company in 21-10424 [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/12/2021 03:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Lindsey P. Bruning for party(s) Appellee Affiliated FM Insurance Company, in case 21-10424 [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/12/2021 03:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Ernest Martin Jr. for Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas in 21-10424 [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/12/2021 03:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Benjamin Lee Mesches for party(s) Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, in case 21-10424 [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/12/2021 03:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Natalie N. Dubose for party(s) Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, in case 21-10424 [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/12/2021 03:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-10424] (Natalie N. Dubose ) [Entered: 05/11/2021 01:01 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-10424] (Benjamin Lee Mesches ) [Entered: 05/11/2021 12:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Ernest Martin, Jr. for Methodist Hospitals of Dallas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10424] (Ernest Martin Jr.) [Entered: 05/11/2021 12:26 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-10424] (Shannon Marie O'Malley ) [Entered: 05/10/2021 02:43 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-10424] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 05/10/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Martin; Attorney for Appellee: O'Malley [21-10424] (Ernest Martin Jr.) [Entered: 05/10/2021 11:35 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-10424] (Lindsey P. Bruning ) [Entered: 05/10/2021 02:50 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10424] (MRW) [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:04 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/16/2021 for Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas. [21-10424] (MRW) [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:05 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9564941-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/03/2021 12:58 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-1504. Electronic ROA due on 05/18/2021. [21-10424] (CBW) [Entered: 05/03/2021 01:01 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Methodist Hospitals of Dallas [21-10424] (LLL) [Entered: 04/27/2021 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
