Kennebrew v. Amarillo Parole
Plaintiff / Appellant: Keith Druzzel Kennebrew
Defendant / Appellee: Amarillo Parole Office, Charles Shipman and Anthony Ramirez
Case Number: 21-10732
Filed: July 20, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 11, 2022 Kennebrew v. Amarillo Parole

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 09/02/2022 08:25 AM]
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motiobn for Extension of Time received from Appellant Mr. Keith Druzzel Kennebrew the time for filing an extension has expired [21-10732] (MRW) [Entered: 09/07/2022 02:00 PM]
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [21-10732 Affirmed ] Judge: RHB , Judge: JWE , Judge: CH Mandate issue date is 09/02/2022 [21-10732] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2022 03:15 PM]
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [21-10732] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2022 03:20 PM]
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order COURT SANCTION WARNING against Keith Druzzel Kennebrew. Reason: The district courts dismissal of Kennebrews complaint as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 53740 (2015). Kennebrew is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).. [21-10732] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2022 04:25 PM]
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: copies are $0.50 per page. A copy of the brief is $12.50 [21-10732] (MRW) [Entered: 03/07/2022 01:38 PM]
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order BRIEFING COMPLETE. [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 10/20/2021 02:53 PM]
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Keith Druzzel Kennebrew. # of Copies Provided: 1 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 10/20/2021 02:53 PM]
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advsie appellant our Court will have the entire district court record to review once briefing is complete [21-10732] (CNF) [Entered: 09/28/2021 12:38 PM]
September 10, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10732] (DDL) [Entered: 09/10/2021 03:16 PM]
September 9, 2021 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Keith Druzzel Kennebrew. Fee deadline satisfied [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 09/09/2021 08:33 AM]
September 9, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 10/19/2021 for Appellant Keith Druzzel Kennebrew. [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 09/09/2021 08:38 AM]
September 9, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:18-CV-39. Electronic ROA due on 09/24/2021. [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 09/09/2021 08:42 AM]
August 23, 2021 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise appellant he may pay the $505.00 by money order to the district court [21-10732] (CNF) [Entered: 08/23/2021 10:52 AM]
August 10, 2021 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/28/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Keith Druzzel Kennebrew because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee or motion for IFP in 5CCA due on 08/27/2021 for Appellant Keith Druzzel Kennebrew [21-10732] (MFY) [Entered: 08/10/2021 08:46 AM]
July 22, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9625045-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [21-10732] (MVM) [Entered: 07/22/2021 11:27 AM]
July 20, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Keith Druzzel Kennebrew [21-10732] (AS) [Entered: 07/20/2021 03:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kennebrew v. Amarillo Parole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Keith Druzzel Kennebrew
Represented By: Keith Druzzel Kennebrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Amarillo Parole Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Charles Shipman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Anthony Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?