USA v. Gonzales
United States of America |
Luis Gonzales, also known as Shorty West |
21-10965 |
September 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
The Anders Brief brief is adopted from consolidated case # 21-10313 on behalf of Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales in 21-10965, 21-10313. Number of copies provided: 0 [21-10965, 21-10313] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2021 09:49 AM] |
MOTION filed by Attorney Ms. Bethany S. Stephens for Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales to withdraw as counsel [9676971-2]. Date of Service: 08/16/2021 [21-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2021 11:07 AM] |
PRO SE RESPONSE filed by Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales to the Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Bethany S. Stephens in 21-10965 [ # 9676971-2 ]. and INCORPORATED MOTION to appoint counsel [9676973-3] Date of Service: 09/07/2021 [21-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2021 11:10 AM] |
COURT ORDER granting Motion to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales [ # 9676182-3 ] in 21-10965; granting Motion to adopt brief filed by Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales (IN DETAIL) [ # 9676182-2 ] in 21-10965 [21-10965, 21-10313] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2021 09:35 AM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales to adopt brief of Appellant in case number 21-10313 and 21-10965 are the exact same case and there is only one underlying case [9676182-2], to consolidate cases 21-10313 and 21-10965 are the exact same case and there is only one underlying case for briefing and oral argument purposes. Date of service: 09/28/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Stephens [21-10965] (Bethany S. Stephens ) [Entered: 09/28/2021 02:44 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 09/28/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Stephens [21-10965] (Bethany S. Stephens ) [Entered: 09/28/2021 02:37 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9674260-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 10/12/2021 for Appellant Luis Gonzales [21-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 09/27/2021 10:15 AM] |
CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Ms. Bethany S. Stephens for Mr. Luis Gonzales. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: NTX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 5:19-CR-142 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 5 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 09/24/2021 [21-10965] (MFY) [Entered: 09/24/2021 03:00 PM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Luis Gonzales [21-10965] (MFY) [Entered: 09/24/2021 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Gonzales | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Luis Gonzales, also known as Shorty West | |
Represented By: | Bethany S. Stephens |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.