Chandler v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 21-11107
Filed: November 2, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2021 MANDATE ISSUED. Mandate issue date satisfied. [21-11107] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/29/2021 08:42 AM]
December 7, 2021 COURT ORDER denying Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Dr. Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr. [ # 9719086-2 ]. Mandate issue date is 12/29/2021. [21-11107] (MBC) [Entered: 12/07/2021 09:12 AM]
November 23, 2021 MOTION filed by Appellant Dr. Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr. for certificate of appealability [9719086-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [21-11107] (CNF) [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:06 AM]
November 23, 2021 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Dr. Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr. in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9719086-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9719091-1] [21-11107] (CNF) [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:07 AM]
November 16, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jennifer Wissinger for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 21-11107 [21-11107] (MVM) [Entered: 11/16/2021 02:59 PM]
November 15, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11107] (Jennifer Wissinger ) [Entered: 11/15/2021 03:01 PM]
November 12, 2021 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/04/2021 granting IFP for Appellant Dr. Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr.. [21-11107] (CAS) [Entered: 11/11/2021 04:42 PM]
November 12, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9710288-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion for COA due on 12/22/2021 for Appellant Darvinal Roy Chandler Jr.. Brief in Support due on 12/22/2021 for Appellant Darvinal Roy Chandler Jr. [21-11107] (CAS) [Entered: 11/11/2021 04:44 PM]
November 12, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-86. Electronic ROA due on 11/29/2021. [21-11107] (CAS) [Entered: 11/11/2021 04:48 PM]
November 12, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-11107] (MRW) [Entered: 11/12/2021 04:31 PM]
November 2, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Dr. Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr. [21-11107] (LLL) [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chandler v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Darvinal Roy Chandler, Jr.
Represented By: Darvinal Roy Chandler Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Casey Leigh Jackson Solomon
Represented By: Jennifer Wissinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?