In re: Trayson Wooden
| In re: Trayson Lashone Wooden |
| 21-11144 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appearance form received from Movant Mr. Trayson Lashone Wooden because Mr. Lumpkin is not a party to the motion for permission to file a successive petition. [21-11144] (CBW) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:04 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [21-11144] (LEF) [Entered: 11/12/2021 02:28 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/12/2021 transferring successive 2254 petition to this court. Date received in 5th Circuit: 11/12/2021. Motion due on 12/13/2021 for Movant Trayson Lashone Wooden [21-11144] (LEF) [Entered: 11/12/2021 02:30 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [21-11144] (LEF) [Entered: 11/12/2021 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Trayson Wooden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Trayson Lashone Wooden | |
| Represented By: | Trayson Lashone Wooden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
