Planned Parenthood v. City of Lubbock, Texas
Plaintiff / Appellant: Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians and patients and G. Sealy Massingill, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Defendant / Appellee: City of Lubbock, Texas
Case Number: 21-11148
Filed: November 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2022 Filing 49 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellants Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services and Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. [ # 48 ] [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 01/21/2022 08:22 AM]
January 20, 2022 Filing 48 UNOPPOSED MOTION to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [48]. Date of service: 01/20/2022 [21-11148] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services to dismiss the appeal [48]. Date of service: 01/20/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bustos, Hacker, Stephens; Attorney for Appellants: Cohen, Green, Lehn, Martin, Muniz, Schoenfeld [21-11148] (Lori A. Martin ) [Entered: 01/20/2022 06:58 PM]
December 20, 2021 Filing 46 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Fernando Manuel Bustos for party(s) Appellee City of Lubbock, Texas, in case 21-11148 [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 12/20/2021 09:48 AM]
December 20, 2021 Filing 45 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andrew Bowman Stephens for Appellee City of Lubbock, Texas in 21-11148 [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 12/20/2021 09:46 AM]
December 17, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11148] (Fernando Manuel Bustos ) [Entered: 12/17/2021 03:01 PM]
December 17, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Andrew Bowman Stephens for City of Lubbock, Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11148] (Andrew Bowman Stephens ) [Entered: 12/17/2021 01:51 PM]
December 15, 2021 COURT ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellants Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services and Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. [ # 9733556-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/02/2022 for Appellants G. Sealy Massingill and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:18 PM]
December 14, 2021 UNOPPOSED MOTION to extend time to file brief as appellant until 02/02/2022 [9733556-2]. Date of service: 12/14/2021 [21-11148] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services to extend time to file brief as appellant until 02/02/2022 [9733556-2]. Date of service: 12/14/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Cohen, Green, Lehn, Martin, Muniz, Schoenfeld; Attorney for Appellees: Hacker, Stephens [21-11148] (Lori A. Martin ) [Entered: 12/14/2021 10:02 AM]
December 10, 2021 COURT ORDER denying Motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellants Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services and Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. [ # 9730519-2 ]; denying Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellants Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services and Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. [ # 9730519-3 ] [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 12/10/2021 04:32 PM]
December 9, 2021 MOTION to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: pending decision in US Supreme Court 21-463, to extend time to file brief as appellant [9730519-3]. Date of service: 12/09/2021 [21-11148] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellants Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: Pending Decision by The Supreme Court in Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, No. 21-463, to extend time to file brief as appellant until 03/04/2022 [9730519-3]. Date of service: 12/09/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Cohen, Green, Lehn, Martin, Muniz, Schoenfeld; Attorney for Appellees: Hacker, Stephens [21-11148] (Lori A. Martin ) [Entered: 12/09/2021 04:35 PM]
November 30, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Richard Muniz for party(s) Appellant Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services Appellant G. Sealy Massingill, in case 21-11148 [21-11148] (RSM) [Entered: 11/30/2021 12:34 PM]
November 30, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Melissa Ann Cohen for party(s) Appellant Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services Appellant G. Sealy Massingill, in case 21-11148 [21-11148] (RSM) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:28 AM]
November 29, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11148] (Richard Muniz ) [Entered: 11/29/2021 11:24 AM]
November 29, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11148] (Melissa Ann Cohen ) [Entered: 11/29/2021 11:20 AM]
November 24, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appearance form for Project Destiny Lubbock, et al because they are not a party to this case [21-11148] (LLL) [Entered: 11/29/2021 10:46 AM]
November 24, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David Lehn for party(s) Appellant Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services Appellant G. Sealy Massingill, in case 21-11148 [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:42 AM]
November 24, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alan E. Schoenfeld for party(s) Appellant Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services Appellant G. Sealy Massingill, in case 21-11148 [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:41 AM]
November 24, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Lori A. Martin for Appellant G. Sealy Massingill in 21-11148, Attorney Lori A. Martin for Appellant Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services in 21-11148 [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:39 AM]
November 24, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Heather Gebelin Hacker for party(s) Appellee City of Lubbock, Texas, in case 21-11148 [21-11148] (CBW) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:37 AM]
November 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11148] (David Lehn ) [Entered: 11/23/2021 02:35 PM]
November 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11148] (Alan E. Schoenfeld ) [Entered: 11/23/2021 02:33 PM]
November 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Lori A. Martin for Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11148] (Lori A. Martin ) [Entered: 11/23/2021 02:23 PM]
November 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11148] (Heather Gebelin Hacker ) [Entered: 11/23/2021 12:20 PM]
November 23, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/03/2022 for Appellants G. Sealy Massingill and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services. [21-11148] (CMB) [Entered: 11/23/2021 08:06 AM]
November 23, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-11148] (CMB) [Entered: 11/23/2021 08:04 AM]
November 19, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9716688-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-11148] (CNF) [Entered: 11/19/2021 12:11 PM]
November 19, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:21-CV-114. Electronic ROA due on 12/06/2021. [21-11148] (CNF) [Entered: 11/19/2021 12:17 PM]
November 17, 2021 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Dr. G. Sealy Massingill, M.D. and Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services [21-11148] (MFY) [Entered: 11/17/2021 02:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Planned Parenthood v. City of Lubbock, Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians and patients
Represented By: Robin M. Green
Represented By: Lori A. Martin
Represented By: Melissa Ann Cohen Esq.
Represented By: David Lehn
Represented By: Richard Muniz
Represented By: Alan E. Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: G. Sealy Massingill, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Represented By: Robin M. Green
Represented By: Lori A. Martin
Represented By: Melissa Ann Cohen Esq.
Represented By: David Lehn
Represented By: Richard Muniz
Represented By: Alan E. Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of Lubbock, Texas
Represented By: Andrew Bowman Stephens
Represented By: Heather Gebelin Hacker
Represented By: Fernando Manuel Bustos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?