Williams v. Warden of USP
Marshall Dewayne Williams |
Warden of USP, Coleman FCI |
21-11214 |
December 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Marshall Dewayne Williams. Fee deadline satisfied. [21-11214] (CBW) [Entered: 01/03/2022 02:23 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9732295-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 12/28/2021 for Appellant Marshall Dewayne Williams [21-11214] (CBW) [Entered: 12/13/2021 10:23 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marshall Dewayne Williams [21-11214] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/08/2021 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Williams v. Warden of USP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Marshall Dewayne Williams | |
Represented By: | Marshall Dewayne Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Warden of USP, Coleman FCI | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.