Woodruff v. Caris MPI
Joseph Woodruff, Erica Jobe, Mandee Katz and Scott Babjak |
Caris MPI, Incorporated and Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated |
21-11249 |
December 17, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Mr. Scott Babjak, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Joseph Woodruff for filing Requesting a Level 1 Extension for Appellants to file Brief until 02/14/2022 [21-11249] (Joseph Leo Lanza ) [Entered: 02/14/2022 12:56 PM] |
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Mr. Scott Babjak, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Joseph Woodruff. Extension Granted to and including 02/28/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/28/2022 for Appellants Scott Babjak, Erica Jobe, Mandee Katz and Joseph Woodruff [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 02/14/2022 01:15 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mark Anthony Flores for party(s) Appellee Caris MPI, Incorporated Appellee Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated, in case 21-11249 [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 01/13/2022 09:08 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kimberly Rives Miers for party(s) Appellee Caris MPI, Incorporated Appellee Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated, in case 21-11249 [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 01/12/2022 09:41 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David B. Jordan for party(s) Appellee Caris MPI, Incorporated Appellee Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated, in case 21-11249 [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 01/12/2022 10:10 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11249] (Mark Anthony Flores ) [Entered: 01/12/2022 05:12 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11249] (David B. Jordan ) [Entered: 01/11/2022 11:37 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11249] (Kimberly Rives Miers ) [Entered: 01/11/2022 10:35 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-11249] (CMB) [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:02 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/15/2022 for Appellants Scott Babjak, Erica Jobe, Mandee Katz and Joseph Woodruff. [21-11249] (CMB) [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:08 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:21-CV-2993. Electronic ROA due on 01/18/2022. [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 01/03/2022 02:40 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Scott Babjak, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Joseph Woodruff advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 01/03/2022 02:39 PM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Mr. Scott Babjak, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Joseph Woodrufffor the Court to process. Date of service: 01/03/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Lanza; Attorney for Appellees: McDonald, Travers. [21-11249] (Joseph Leo Lanza ) [Entered: 01/03/2022 11:30 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Joseph Leo Lanza for Mr. Scott Babjak, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Joseph Woodruff for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11249] (Joseph Leo Lanza ) [Entered: 12/29/2021 12:11 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joseph Leo Lanza for Appellant Scott Babjak in 21-11249, Attorney Joseph Leo Lanza for Appellant Mandee Katz in 21-11249, Attorney Joseph Leo Lanza for Appellant Erica Jobe in 21-11249, Attorney Joseph Leo Lanza for Appellant Joseph Woodruff in 21-11249 [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 12/29/2021 03:10 PM] |
Attorney Mr. Joseph Leo Lanza for Appellants Mr. Joseph Woodruff, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Scott Babjak is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [21-11249] (BF) [Entered: 12/27/2021 08:56 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Sherry L. Travers for Appellee Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated in 21-11249, by Attorney(s) Sherry L. Travers for party(s) Appellee Caris MPI, Incorporated, in case 21-11249 [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 12/27/2021 11:44 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Scott McDonald for party(s) Appellee Caris MPI, Incorporated Appellee Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated, in case 21-11249 [21-11249] (CAS) [Entered: 12/23/2021 02:44 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-11249] (Michael Scott McDonald ) [Entered: 12/23/2021 10:40 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Sherry L. Travers for Caris Life Sciences, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11249] (Sherry L. Travers ) [Entered: 12/23/2021 03:26 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the appearance form filed by Michael McDonald in light of appearance form being a duplicate for attorney Michael McDonald. The image was replaced for the original appearance form. [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 12/27/2021 11:56 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11249] (Charles M.R. Vethan ) [Entered: 12/23/2021 05:04 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9741171-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 01/06/2022 for Appellants Scott Babjak, Erica Jobe, Mandee Katz and Joseph Woodruff [21-11249] (LEF) [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:56 PM] |
COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Jeff Foster. [21-11249] (Jeff Foster ) [Entered: 12/21/2021 02:27 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Scott Babjak, Ms. Erica Jobe, Ms. Mandee Katz and Mr. Joseph Woodruff [21-11249] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/17/2021 06:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.