Outlaw v. Lumpkin
| Byron Orrick Outlaw |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 21-11276 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Orrick Outlaw for certificate of appealability [9775397-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [21-11276] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:55 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Orrick Outlaw in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9775397-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9775400-1] [21-11276] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:56 AM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9775397-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Orrick Outlaw [21-11276] (MRW) [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:57 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Orrick Outlaw to proceed in forma pauperis [9767566-2] Fee deadline canceled. [21-11276] (MRW) [Entered: 02/01/2022 11:00 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-11276] (CMB) [Entered: 01/13/2022 04:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Elizabeth Alisse Goettert for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 21-11276 [21-11276] (LLL) [Entered: 01/05/2022 12:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Elizabeth Alisse Goettert for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-11276] (Elizabeth Alisse Goettert ) [Entered: 01/05/2022 09:40 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/27/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Byron Orrick Outlaw. [21-11276] (LLL) [Entered: 01/03/2022 11:19 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9746103-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee deadline updated to 02/14/2022 for Appellant Byron Orrick Outlaw. Motion due on 02/14/2022 for Appellant Byron Orrick Outlaw. Brief in Support due on 02/14/2022 for Appellant Byron Orrick Outlaw [21-11276] (LLL) [Entered: 01/03/2022 11:21 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 7:20-CV-106. Electronic ROA due on 01/18/2022. [21-11276] (LLL) [Entered: 01/03/2022 11:25 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Orrick Outlaw [21-11276] (CBW) [Entered: 12/27/2021 08:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Outlaw v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Byron Orrick Outlaw | |
| Represented By: | Byron Orrick Outlaw |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Alisse Goettert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
