Est of Nicholas v. City of Houston
Petitioner: Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas and Estate of Dennis Tuttle
Appellant: City of Houston
Case Number: 21-20015
Filed: January 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2021 REPLY filed by Appellant City of Houston [9517750-1] to the Response/Opposition filed by Appellees Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas and Estate of Dennis Tuttle [ # 9516684-2 ], to the Motion filed by Appellees Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas and Estate of Dennis Tuttle [ # 9516684-3 ], to the Motion filed by Appellant City of Houston [ # 9508366-2 ]. Date of Service: 03/04/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Lee, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin. [21-20015] (Christy Lynn Martin ) [Entered: 03/04/2021 04:28 PM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Timothy F. Lee for party(s) Appellee Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas, in case 21-20015 [21-20015] (SDH) [Entered: 03/03/2021 04:04 PM]
March 3, 2021 RESPONSE/OPPOSITION [9516684-1] to the Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant City of Houston in 21-20015 [ # 9508366-2 ] and INCORPORATED MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9516684-3] Date of Service: 03/03/2021. [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Estate of Dennis Tuttle and Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas [9516684-1] to the Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant City of Houston in 21-20015 [ # 9508366-2 ] Response/Opposition deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 03/03/2021. [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas [9516684-1] to the Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant City of Houston [ # 9508366-2 ] Date of Service: 03/03/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Lee, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin. [21-20015] (Timothy F. Lee ) [Entered: 03/03/2021 06:04 PM]
March 2, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20015] (Timothy F. Lee ) [Entered: 03/02/2021 10:58 AM]
February 22, 2021 OPPOSED MOTION to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9508366-2]. Date of service: 02/22/2021 Response/Opposition due on 03/04/2021. [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant City of Houston to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9508366-2]. Date of service: 02/22/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin [21-20015] (Christy Lynn Martin ) [Entered: 02/22/2021 10:29 AM]
February 22, 2021 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for City of Houston in 21-20015. Update: changed originating party type to null. [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 02/22/2021 11:33 AM]
January 28, 2021 LETTER filed by Appellee Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas Update Court of related filings.. Date of Service: 01/28/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin [21-20015] (Michael Patrick Doyle ) [Entered: 01/28/2021 06:15 PM]
January 22, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the transcript order form ordering the 1/4/21 telephone scheduling conference transcript received from Appellant City of Houston because due to the status of the appeal, a motion to supplement the record is required [21-20015] (JMW) [Entered: 01/22/2021 04:08 PM]
January 14, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20015] (MRW) [Entered: 01/14/2021 08:48 AM]
January 14, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/23/2021 for Appellant City of Houston. [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 01/14/2021 12:15 PM]
January 13, 2021 APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF filed by Appellant City of Houston. [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF FILED by Appellant City of Houston Letter Brief requested by the Court.. Date of Service: 01/13/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin [21-20015] (Christy Lynn Martin ) [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:46 PM]
January 12, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Timothy Gallagher for Appellee Estate of Dennis Tuttle in 21-20015 [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 01/12/2021 09:29 AM]
January 11, 2021 APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF filed by Estate of Dennis Tuttle. [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0. [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S LETTER BRIEF FILED by Estate of Dennis Tuttle. Date of service: 01/11/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin [21-20015] (Michael Timothy Gallagher ) [Entered: 01/11/2021 06:06 PM]
January 11, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Patrick Doyle for Appellee Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas in 21-20015 [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 01/11/2021 02:04 PM]
January 11, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christy Lynn Martin for Appellant City of Houston in 21-20015 [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 01/11/2021 02:02 PM]
January 11, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Timothy Gallagher, Esq. for Estate of Dennis Tuttle for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20015] (Michael Timothy Gallagher ) [Entered: 01/11/2021 04:02 PM]
January 10, 2021 RESPONSE/OPPOSITION [9478744-1] to the Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellant City of Houston in 21-20015 [ # 9478347-2 ] [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas [9478744-1] to the Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellants City of Houston and City of Houston [ # 9478347-2 ] Date of Service: 01/10/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin. [21-20015] (Michael Patrick Doyle ) [Entered: 01/10/2021 05:23 PM]
January 8, 2021 OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant City of Houston for stay pending appeal [9478347-2]. Ruling is requested by: 01/11/2021. Date of service: 01/08/2021 [21-20015] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant City of Houston for stay pending appeal [9478347-2] Ruling is requested by: 01/11/2021. Date of service: 01/08/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Avery, Doyle, Gallagher, Smith; Attorney for Appellant: Martin [21-20015] (Christy Lynn Martin ) [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:15 PM]
January 8, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-4287. Electronic ROA due on 01/25/2021. [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:07 PM]
January 8, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9478327-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20015] (RLL) [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:02 PM]
January 8, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Christy Lynn Martin for City of Houston for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20015] (Christy Lynn Martin ) [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:48 PM]
January 8, 2021 COURT ORDER that Appellant's opposed motion for stay pending appeal is GRANTED pending further order of the court. The parties shall file letter briefs addressing this court's appellate jurisdiction and removability on or before close of business Wednesday, January 13, 2021 [ # 9478347-2 ]. [21-20015] (MCS) [Entered: 01/08/2021 06:12 PM]
January 8, 2021 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant City of Houston [21-20015] (CAG) [Entered: 01/08/2021 01:40 PM]
January 8, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Patrick Doyle for Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20015] (Michael Patrick Doyle ) [Entered: 01/08/2021 04:54 PM]
January 8, 2021 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion for stay pending appeal [ # 9478347-2 ] filed by Appellant City of Houston Date of Service: 01/08/2021 [21-20015] (CAG) [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Est of Nicholas v. City of Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Estate of Rhogena Ann Nicholas
Represented By: Michael Patrick Doyle
Represented By: Jeffrey I. Avery
Represented By: Timothy F. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Estate of Dennis Tuttle
Represented By: Michael Timothy Gallagher Esq.
Represented By: Larry Boyd Smith Esq. Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: City of Houston
Represented By: Christy Lynn Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?