Lennie JacksonIn re: Lennie Jackson
| In re: Lennie Jackson |
| 21-20045 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 9491394-2 ] filed by Petitioner Mr. Lennie Jackson [21-20045] (DLM) [Entered: 01/28/2021 09:36 AM] |
| PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Lennie Jackson for writ of mandamus [9491394-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/27/2021. Fee due on 02/26/2021 for Petitioner Lennie Jackson. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 02/26/2021 for Petitioner Lennie Jackson. Date of Service: 01/26/2021 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs a corrected certificate of service on the trial court judge and filing fee. [21-20045] (DLM) [Entered: 01/27/2021 04:18 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [21-20045] (DLM) [Entered: 01/27/2021 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lennie JacksonIn re: Lennie Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Lennie Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Lennie Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
