Johnson v. FDIC
Plaintiff / Appellant: E. W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank
Case Number: 21-20095
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/20/2021 for Appellant E. W. Johnson. [21-20095] (DDL) [Entered: 03/11/2021 04:45 PM]
March 11, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20095] (DDL) [Entered: 03/11/2021 04:41 PM]
March 8, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John Guarisco, Marcie Lynn Schout, William Lance Lewis for party(s) Appellee FDIC Appellee JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., in case 21-20095 [21-20095] (ABT) [Entered: 03/08/2021 09:23 AM]
March 8, 2021 Tracy Estes does not represent JP Morgan. [21-20095] (ABT) [Entered: 03/08/2021 09:25 AM]
March 8, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. E. W. Johnson advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-20095] (RLL) [Entered: 03/09/2021 10:12 AM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20095] (William Lance Lewis ) [Entered: 03/03/2021 02:49 PM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20095] (Marcie Lynn Schout ) [Entered: 03/03/2021 02:46 PM]
March 3, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20095] (John Guarisco ) [Entered: 03/03/2021 09:55 AM]
March 1, 2021 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. E. W. Johnson. [21-20095] (RLL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:51 PM]
March 1, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9514534-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20095] (RLL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:53 PM]
March 1, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-48. Electronic ROA due on 03/16/2021. [21-20095] (RLL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:59 PM]
February 23, 2021 US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. E. W. Johnson [21-20095] (RLL) [Entered: 02/23/2021 04:53 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Johnson v. FDIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: E. W. Johnson
Represented By: E. W. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Tracey Dawn Estes
Represented By: Marcie Lynn Schout Esq.
Represented By: William Lance Lewis Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank
Represented By: Tracey Dawn Estes
Represented By: John Guarisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?