Jackson v. Baidoo
| James A. Baidoo, Correctional Officer, Major Julia M. Rodriguez and Captain Garrett R. Simmons |
| Reidie James Jackson |
| 21-20135 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Reidie James Jackson referencing Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA filed by Appellant Mr. Reidie James Jackson in 21-20135 [ # 9545129-2 ]. [21-20135] (RLL) [Entered: 04/15/2021 02:49 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20135] (MRW) [Entered: 04/08/2021 11:16 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-3920. Electronic ROA due on 04/22/2021. [21-20135] (DLM) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:04 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Reidie James Jackson to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER. [9545129-2] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 03/24/2021 [21-20135] (DLM) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:03 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9528950-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/02/2021 for Appellant Reidie James Jackson [21-20135] (NFD) [Entered: 03/18/2021 10:38 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Reidie James Jackson [21-20135] (CAG) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
