Amin v. Mayorkas
| Gregory Richardson, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Texas Service Center, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Officer XM1698, Tracy Renaud, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States of America |
| Bhaveshkumar Amin |
| 21-20212 |
| April 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Vanessa Molina for party(s) Appellee Gregory Richardson Appellee Officer XM1698 Appellee USA Appellee Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Appellee Tracy Renaud, in case 21-20212 [21-20212] (CCR) [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:02 AM] |
| COURT ORDER granting Motion to view and obtain sealed document filed by Appellant Mr. Bhaveshkumar Amin [ # 9592082-2 ]; granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Bhaveshkumar Amin [ # 9592082-3 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/29/2021 for Appellant Bhaveshkumar Amin [21-20212] (CCR) [Entered: 06/09/2021 02:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20212] (Vanessa Molina ) [Entered: 06/09/2021 03:24 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION to view and obtain sealed document, to extend time to file brief as appellant until 06/29/2021 [9592082-3]. Date of service: 06/08/2021 [21-20212] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION to view and obtain sealed document. Date of service: 06/08/2021 [21-20212] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Bhaveshkumar Amin to unseal document. Date of service: 06/08/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Green; Attorney for Appellee: Robinson-Gaither [21-20212] (Sheridan Gary Green ) [Entered: 06/08/2021 04:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Sheridan Gary Green for Appellant Bhaveshkumar Amin in 21-20212 [21-20212] (CCR) [Entered: 05/10/2021 11:04 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Sheridan Gary Green for Mr. Bhaveshkumar Amin for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20212] (Sheridan Gary Green ) [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:12 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/14/2021 for Appellant Bhaveshkumar Amin. [21-20212] (CMB) [Entered: 05/03/2021 02:18 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20212] (CMB) [Entered: 05/03/2021 02:16 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9561326-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20212] (CCR) [Entered: 04/28/2021 11:38 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-1043. Electronic ROA due on 05/13/2021. [21-20212] (CCR) [Entered: 04/28/2021 12:13 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-20212] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Bhaveshkumar Amin advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 04/27/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Green; Attorney for Appellee: Robinson-Gaither [21-20212] (Sheridan Gary Green ) [Entered: 04/27/2021 03:49 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Bhaveshkumar Amin [21-20212] (CAG) [Entered: 04/22/2021 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
