Class v. Davis
| Kimberly Klock, Christopher S. Lacox, Cesar Trevino, TDCJ Director Lorie Davis, Candy L. Montgomery, Kelly L. Strong, Lisa M. Nichols and Isaac J. Clark |
| Luis E. Class |
| 21-20243 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Luis E. Class to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9606716-2] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 06/21/2021 [21-20243] (DLM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:28 PM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Luis E. Class in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9606716-2 ]. Date of Service: 06/21/2021. [9606718-1] [21-20243] (DLM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:31 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/03/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Luis E. Class because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 07/06/2021 for Appellant Luis E. Class [21-20243] (ABT) [Entered: 06/04/2021 12:01 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete for main and additional appeals, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9571465-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 07/06/2021 for Appellant Luis E. Class [21-20243] (SDH) [Entered: 05/11/2021 01:11 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9569117-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Luis E. Class. [9569117-1] [21-20243] (CAG) [Entered: 05/07/2021 10:22 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Luis E. Class [21-20243] (RLL) [Entered: 05/05/2021 03:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
